Call Us Now
Section 498A IPC was introduced in 1983 to protect married women from cruelty inflicted by their husband or his relatives. It was a significant step in addressing domestic violence and dowry-related harassment, both serious social problems in India.
Who it applies to: Husband or relative of the husband of a woman.
Nature of the offense: Cognizable, non-bailable, and non-compoundable
(meaning it cannot be withdrawn by the complainant without court permission).
While 498A was enacted with good intentions, over the years, there have been numerous instances where it has allegedly been misused.
A false 498A case refers to a situation where:
A woman files a baseless complaint of cruelty or dowry harassment.
The accusations are either exaggerated or fabricated.
Often filed to settle personal scores during marital disputes, or to pressure the husband into a
favorable divorce or settlement.
Consequences of False 498A:
Arrest without proper investigation (though recent guidelines have curbed this).
Stigma and mental trauma for the accused and their families.
Prolonged legal battles, often resulting in misuse of judicial time and resources
The Supreme Court of India and various High Courts have acknowledged misuse of Section 498A.
Balancing Act: There's a need to protect genuine victims while also
preventing misuse of legal provisions.
Awareness & Mediation: Family counseling and mediation are encouraged before resorting
to
criminal proceedings.
Amendments & Guidelines: Legal reforms and Supreme Court guidelines have tried to ensure
that only genuine cases result in prosecution.
Section 498A remains a crucial tool for safeguarding women against cruelty and dowry harassment. However, the potential for misuse demands judicial caution, police discretion, and balanced application to ensure justice for all parties involved. False 498A cases not only harm the innocent but also dilute the seriousness of genuine complaints.